Monday, December 5, 2011
the future of mankind is... um... inside our jumpsuits
I'll be totally honest again.
I do not like jacket copy.
You know, the shorty-short stuff inside dust jackets or on the back of the book that serves to abbreviate the attractive elements to a story?
That stuff.
So when I read it, I keep reminding myself that it is no good. In fact, I often will not read jacket copy on a book until I'm nearly finished with the book, and then, I'm usually, like, eeewww!
I'll be honest yet again: A good cover will make me pick up a book. If I put it down, it's because of the jacket copy (which I won't read at all if I'm seriously thinking about reading the book). I won't even pick up a book with a bad cover, or if it has a cover that would be embarrassing to carry around.
The Steve Jobs cover is good.
You know what it says to me?
It says, "This man is insane."
If it were the author photo on the back of the jacket, as opposed to the cover, I would never touch that book.
That is another thing: If a book has a full-cover author photo on the back of the dust jacket, I will not pick it up. If you are such big-name author that your publisher would actually suggest printing a dust jacket with a photo of YOU as the entire back cover, and you (assuming you are that big of a name) actually are okay with that, you know what it says to me?
This author is insane.
I mention all of this simply because over the weekend I was reading some short jacket-copy summaries for books that are going to be coming out in 2012. I will not say what books they were, or name the publishers or authors, but they all sounded unreadably horrid.
But that's just what jacket copy does to me, I think.
So let me circle my literary wagons and offer an intervening blast at jacket copy for 2012's Passenger, my book, the sequel to The Marbury Lens.
Excited?
Here goes:
A magical flying unicorn that shits frosted raspberry cupcakes from its ass enchants the whimsical world of Marbury, turning it into a fanciful playland...
Fooled you, didn't I?
Bet you want a frosted raspberry cupcake now, don't you?
Um.
Okay.
How about this - the version without the unicorns and cupcakes:
Jack and Conner prepare to leave for England. They have a plan. They think it's the only reasonable way to deal with the Marbury lens. But the four boys - Jack, Conner, Ben, and Griffin - end up scattered in different places at different times. Jack is lost in a Marbury that isn't Marbury, a Glenbrook that isn't Glenbrook, pursued through every crumbling not-world by an uncaring cop trying to solve the mystery of Freddie Horvath's murder, and a deceitful kid named Quinn Cahill who believes he is the King of Marbury. Jack's universe is collapsing in on itself. He finds his friends. He finds his home. There's always just one thing, and Jack knows it. This can't be it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

7 comments:
"from its ass?"
Really?
Are there creatures that shit from locations other than their ass? Oh yeah, some people shit from their mouths. I forgot.
Anyway, I don't read jacket copy either, and I have a funny story for you because of it.
Remember Sarah Fine? The psychologist who introduced me to your blog? Yeah, she's awesome. Anyway, I got all mad at her for the post she wrote about Marbury, because I felt like she had given away a spoiler.
Then she pointed out the spoiler was in the jacket copy.
Yes, I'm a fucking idiot.
We laughed about it (virtually) afterward, or at least I did.
If Marbury was a playground, I would not let any kids play there. Marbury would scare the shit out of any normal little kid. Not to mention the fact that ass cupcakes would probably taste horrible.
That "jacket copy" makes me hyperventilate.
What are we meant to do for the next year until this comes out? (I mean, yeah, there's real life and all of that, but seriously....)
I'm surprised you didn't mentioned titles. I've picked up books for their titles, but put them down again due to the cover (although I have to admit that this practice almost caused me to miss out on one of my favorite books which has a truly aweful cover. So you think I might have learned....)
Anyhow, if a book passes those two tests, I do admit to scimming jacket copy and pretty much forgetting it immediately after I decide whether or not to read the book.
Matthew - I love Sarah's blog. I think I found her through Andrew's. Funny.
Oh and...if this new thing I'm working on ever sees the light of day, I didn't steal the name Quinn from you. Just for the record! :-)
Jacket copy is oppressive.
Are the cupcakes allergen-free? They need to be. Or parents will sue the unicorns.
Marbury is inevitable.
Aye. I hate reading jacket copy for ANY book. It its good, the actual prose in the actual story will tell me.
But I respect the people who have to come up with jacket copy. Poor, tortured souls.
Holy shit.
I think I peed myself a little bit when I read that "jacket copy".
So thankful for the amazing cover for The Marbury Lens. I would not have picked it up otherwise and would've really missed out. I almost put it down again after reading the blurb to be honest...but I couldn't resist that cover.
Post a Comment