Thursday, February 10, 2011

two headed boy


So here is something that frequently isn't written about on writers' blogs. It's about the technical process of getting a book out.

For you up-and-coming types out there.

This happens after the writing, the editorial letter, the revisions, the copy-edits. And, the way things have happened with the production of my books may be different from the steps toward actual release for other authors, too, so, as usual, don't take me overly seriously.

Yesterday, my editor let me know that she had seen the final pages for my next novel, Stick, which is going to be released this fall, with ARCs coming out next month, in March.

The final pages are the unbound, print-ready pages with cut marks on them. They are pretty much exactly the way the pages are going to look for the final products -- the ARC, and, afterward, the released publication.

And this is the first time I haven't actually held those pages in my hand [Note -- this is not a passive-aggressive plea for some kind of delivery of the goods]. We were going to go direct from the copy-edits to the ARC, but my editor and I both felt that a look at the final, typeset pages for this novel would be necessary because a significant part of the story has to do with the way the words are actually formatted on the printed page.

Oooh.

I am fortunate to have a few writer friends. They range across the spectrum of nice to mean, but they all have one thing in common: they are wickedly talented. Anyway, I told my friend Sara Zarr about the process, and she was, like, wow... that would freak me out to go straight from copy edits directly to the ARC.

Well, that wasn't exactly what she said, but it was the gist of it.

By the way, Sara is one of the very few people who has read Stick (whose final pages and concepts for its mysterious cover I have not laid eyes upon -- just sayin'), and she wrote a very, very nice blurb about it.

So, anyway, my editor expressed, I think, some relief that the final pages turned out beautifully... and if we need to make any changes to it, we can still do it after the ARCs come out.

Which makes me kind of nervously sick, just thinking about it.

My opinion only: Even though they say things like "Uncorrected Proof" on them, ARCs should be perfect.

Ugh.

Why am I a two-headed boy?

Well, for one thing, not only do I get torn up about the technical stuff (the typeset pages for The Marbury Lens made me go absolutely insane -- lose sleep and everything -- because some line breaks were omitted), but I've been praying for a break from writing for maybe a year now and it hasn't come.

Part of me knows I really should take a break. I'm killing myself. But I haven't been able to stop. I am writing another novel right now.

I usually can predict fairly accurately my completion date for a novel well ahead of time (barring any distractions like copy editing or revising another project). I'm predicting April 22 on this one.

We'll see if the two-headed boy is using his brains on that calculation.



Here are some pictures of what final pages look like, from The Marbury Lens:


Notice the trim-marks on the pages.


The Post-It note on top is from my amazing editor (awww....). The notes inside are mistakes and other assorted WTF moments.


13 comments:

Matthew Rush said...

Take you seriously? Definitely. Take you overly seriously? Never.

I have to say that this is fascinating. I'be been receiving ARCs for a while now, and it certainly is exciting, but nothing like this (I can only assume). I would imagine it has to be just as nerve-wracking as it is exciting.

Thanks for sharing the details of your journey Andrew.

Michael Grant said...

I go from very hard-working in the initial writing to almost indifferent in later phases. I don't want to see paper at all, just send me the marked -up docs. Or not even that. Once I hit that little paper airplane "send" button I don't really ever want to see the thing back here again.

aspiring_x said...

I bet all that worry about perfection leads to an amazing end product. Thanks for telling us a bit about the process. I have no idea about that kind of thing.

Tabitha said...

Thanks for sharing. I love it when authors share the not-so-common stuff like this. And I feel the same way about ARCs...even though they're not supposed to be perfect, they still should be. :)

I have the same problem you're having in that I should be taking a break but I'm writing another novel. I can't seem to help myself, because I love it and am very excited about it, but it's also stretching me pretty thin. Which means it's taking much longer than usual, and that's making me feel stretched even thinner. Double-edged sword, I guess. :)

Andrew Smith said...

It's kind of surprising to me about this. I happen to have a final-pages copy of The Marbury Lens sitting here right now. I know I should get rid of stuff like this -- it just piles up and up all over my office. Maybe I should give it away...

Anyway, I'm going to take a picture of it and try to upload it onto this blog post today. You may notice all the Post-It notes stuck to it -- coming out the tops of the pages. These are mistakes I caught before it became an ARC. Usually, I write things on the notes, like What the fuck???.

Matthew Rush said...

I don't know if typesetting is an art or a science, but I find it equal parts intriguing and incomprehensible.

Connie said...

You could auction it off for charity but I'm wondering if you could part with it.

**a few days late but great video.

Joe Lunievicz said...

I just sent my galleys back to the publisher and it was a nerve wracking task to review everything against the proofed final version I sent in - on a tight deadline. I'm with Michael Grant in that once I hit the send button I don't want to see it again. On the other hand a chapter heading was repeated (first and last) incorrectly, the name of a good friend in the acknowledgements was left out (that would have taken some explaining) - her name just disappeared between the final proofed manuscript and the galley - and there were six technical errors, small but important (two eyes when a character only has one - that kind of thing). So I assume, when I some day finish another book and if it's lucky enough to work its way through to publication, I'll probaly hope to never see it again but then agonize over the printed page one more once.

Connie said...

those kind of "little" things are really big mistakes, seriously how does that happen? An author goes through a lot just to get an amazing story on paper in a format they want and then some yahoo changes things, omits bits and pieces and makes a few technical errors. Are you sure these guys are paid professionals? Maybe I don't get the job of a typesetter but I always thought any position in the publishing field so be of the highest standard.

Andrew Smith said...

I think it's relatively easy to make a typo, and we all know how invisible some typos can be.

The other thing, I think, that makes the job of the type designer difficult is that there is not a widely-adhered to standard (correct me if I'm wrong on this, those of you who know) that remains uniform from house to house on things like symbols for line breaks (I never used them previously -- just hit double returns... but now I use some kind of visual clue to show a typesetter that there is supposed to be a break there), use of italicization, and so forth.

So that can cause headaches.

I have seen some manuscripts, for example, where the author actually italicizes italics (craziness!!!!), but I always underline it.

And, as far as I know, type designers tend to be (I may be wrong here, too) freelancers who work from home, so don't necessarily have face-to-face discussions with copy editors, managing editors, authors, or the other people on the editorial team.

All that opens up a lot of possibilities for slips at any stage in the process... and these slips can frequently go unnoticed, especially if you've read the damned thing a hundred times or more.

Biggest advice to writers: ALWAYS read your stuff when it comes back "corrected." Chances are, the corrections have fucked parts of it up.

Michael Grant said...

On the other hand a chapter heading was repeated (first and last) incorrectly, the name of a good friend in the acknowledgements was left out...

Oh, great, thanks a lot Joe, now I suppose I have to read the damned thing over again.

Andrew Smith said...

I have the most kick-ass friends.

Go ahead, girls, ask us ANYTHING.

Joe Lunievicz said...

I forgot to add - my glossary (2-pages) was also missing. It got lost somewhere between the publisher's final review and the typesetter's hands. It's going back in because I caught it but...

The good thing is, there is still one final proofing that has to be done- so even if I missed this, the "fullback" of the publishing world (sorry about the rugby reference) would most likely make the tackle.

I'm trying to have a sense of humor about the whole thing. And I have to say, on behalf of the publisher, the book looks great (font, design, chapter heads that are correct). I think you're right, Andrew, human error, is human error. That's why there's so many chances to "catch" them

And Michael, you're welcome!