Wednesday, November 16, 2011
nobody makes hair shirts nowadays (part three)
Now it's time to talk about the water.
In the first post on this subject, I mentioned that I'd told Rachael you can't honestly write something THE PEOPLE are going to call Young + Adult and omit the element of sexuality/sexual identity.
It's the same thing as the water to the fish in the Zen parable: It is everywhere, at all times; it is the universal climate change that occurs during the Young Adult experience. And it puts particular pressure on boys, which, I suppose, is why Rachael found The Marbury Lens so intriguing, and why she asked the question.
In the book, in several passages, Jack rants about how much he hates being a teenager -- that there is nothing remotely whimsical or adorable in the sexual awkwardness and the external pressure he feels to "be a man." Like a lot of kids, he is confused and anxious, even questions his sexual orientation at times.
This is all part of the universal experience, I think, but it can also be emotionally troubling for kids like Jack, especially when combined with other traumatic (in Jack's case, at least) events.
Let me tell you a little side note about mean comments (and another mean comment story will come up later in this post): When my first book, Ghost Medicine, came out, I received more than a few comments from people (none of whom happened to be males, but I am not going to make a generalized statement as to the significance of this) who said Boys are not introspective like this in real life. They do not look inside themselves and examine things like love and life and friendship. This stuff never happens with real boys.
I am not making this shit up. That is the truth.
The thing is, that because boys (like Jack) feel so much pressure to "suck it up," to not express unmanly feelings (as though society dictates that genderless emotions such as love, attraction, or appreciation of beauty are feminine, and that other -- equally genderless emotions -- are masculine) externally, they are, in fact entirely vastly more likely to be introspective than girls, especially when it comes to sexuality, sexual identity, and the anxiety they feel because of sexual expectations -- pressures from outside.
If you don't realize that, then I am glad I taught you something which may make your head explode.
It is my job to tell the truth.
And this really is (if there were such a thing) a recurring concept that ripples through just about every book I have ever written.
When you pile all these pressures and expectations on a reasonably bright and aware kid, like Jack, from The Marbury Lens, it is not at all unreasonable for him to conclude -- as he does -- that there must be something wrong with him, and he better not talk about it, too.
Which brings us to Conner.
Lots of over-the-top mean comments came in about that character, the book, and me -- all because of Conner Kirk. In fact, there was a blogospheric supernova that occurred on one Oh-I-am-a-self-proclaimed-BOOK-BLOGGER's blog about how homophobic and bullying I am to have included a character like Conner Kirk in The Marbury Lens.
I am not making that shit up, either.
That person just doesn't get teenage boys.
Conner Kirk is the absolute opposite of a homophobic person. He masks his own curiosity and self-doubt behind a veneer of boisterous masculinity -- always testing Jack, wondering if his friend will have more guts than Conner does himself and come out and talk openly about sexual confusion and the pressure to "act like a man."
Of course, neither boy does that, because boys aren't allowed to do such things, and Conner, if nothing else, is society's manifestation of a perfect boy. Inside, he's got some issues, like most of us did at that age.
It's normal stuff.
Tomorrow, I am off to Miami, where I promise to make 700 kids' heads explode.
I have been working on this speech and presentation for them, and I honestly think it's some of the coolest shit a writer will ever tell young people.
I'll tell you about that later.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

12 comments:
You have to wonder how these people can know what is going on in a boy's head. Especially since they're not teenage boys. Correct me if I'm wrong, but mind reading hasn't been made to the public, has it?
Making heads explode since 1963 (or whenever the hell you were born).
I would have loved to have my head blown up by someone like you when I was young. I had no adults in my life who knew what was up.
Thanks for sharing this, Andrew. I loved getting inside a teenage boy's head in the Marbury Lens.
A few months ago, I had an online conversation with a (male) book blogger who was wondering if he should read Marbury Lens. It went something like this:
Me: YES! Best book of 2010! Read it now.
Blogger: But...people have said it's homophobic.
Me: It isn't. Read it. Make up your own mind.
Blogger: But people have said...so, no, I can't read it.
Me: :-(
I'm not sure what pissed me off most about this conversation. That he was missing out on a hell of great book, that he was basing decisions on "what people said" even if those people were incorrect, or that he's a freaking blogger who is out there sharing his opinion, but who doesn't have the guts to make his own interpretation of the book.
Also...I'm a Jewish female. Does that mean I shouldn't read a book that someone once said might include an anti-Semitic misogynist?
Anyhow...Isn't reading all about learning about OTHER people?
There are so many things I love about Marbury Lens, not the least of which is the honesty of Jack and Connor's relationship. When I was that age, I DID know boys who talked about these things, I was certainly never under any delusion that they didn't think about them. I don't know why authors always tend to sanitize this stuff. (Well, I do, but I'm grateful that there are writers like you who tell it like it is).
Sorry for the rant. Now I'm all pissed off again....
Wow.
That seriously makes me very sad, Helene.
This is not to take away from anything Helene said, but I just think that anyone who would not read a book because some other moron called it whatever, on the stupid fucking internet, is a tool who doesn't deserve to read great books like Marbury, because he probably wouldn't get it.
I'm reading all this through the haze of some enhanced cough syrup, but except for the last part about the serious joy of talking to kids and making their heads explode, this whole subject fills me with rage. Homophobic? Boys don't have emotions, aren't sensitive?
I think that people who say these things were never boys, or have never seen boys, really seen them. Never bothered to. Really seeing people takes time, and it's easier to slide your eyes over something than look and be made uncomfortable.
It's important for boys to have authors who were boys write about it and get to the guts of the experience.
That's why what you do is important and I'm going to keep saying it.
Matthew - Yeah. A part of me agrees. I definitely lost respect for him which is a shame, because I'd previously enjoyed discussing books with him.
But I'm an eternal optimist. Perhaps someone more tenacious than I am will convince him otherwise.
Kristen - (Feel better!) Yes. Exactly. :-)
Well, if someone I trusted told me a book was homophobic I'd probably scratch it off my "to-read" list because hey, there are a lot of books in the world and I don't have all the time. But if someone else I trusted said it wasn't, then I might check it out. I can definitely see how that is frustrating for authors who are falsely accused so I try to do my own research but I can understand the basic concept of avoiding books you've heard those kind of things about. *shrug*
I can also kind of understand where the people who worry about the book's homophobia are coming from. Let me say quickly that I loved the book and I think that it has some brilliant exploration of teenagers struggling with their masculinity, so this isn't an attack! I think that what people are responding to is not just the gay jokes that Connor makes, but also the fact that the book features two male sexual "predators" (I mean, Gary is not the same as Freddy of course but it has a similar effect) in addition to the fact that Jack finds solace in a heterosexual relationship and that there are few women in Marbury. It kind of evokes a feeling where men's sexual desires are confusing and often bad, unless they are focused by a woman. I don't think that's the ONLY feeling it evokes and I think that feeling is pretty natural for Jack to be have given his experiences.
Now is any of that inherently bad? Of course not. It's a slice of someone's life story and as an author you're not obligated to have a neon flashing light that goes HEY THERE ARE MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH OTHER MEN AND THEY AREN'T BAD PEOPLE THEY ARE VERY LOVING. I think that especially in first person, these kinds of things can be difficult because you have to be true to the character's voice. If you had Jack start thinking about how sure, these bad things happened to him but it doesn't mean that all gay men are predators blah blah blah it would be really out of character. My guess is that readers are hearing that weird tension in Jack about male sexuality and then wanting there to be something in the book to counteract that because it makes them feel uncomfortable and then when they don't find it, they feel even more uncomfortable. I think all that is totally understandable.
The part where they lose me is where they're incapable of self-reflection and instead project this discomfort onto the author i.e. THIS BOOK IS HOMOPHOBIC. I don't think Marbury Lens is homophobic at all. I think that it actually deals with the negative effects of homophobia...Connor's inability to express his love for Jack, Jack's inability to tell people about what happened to him...those only exist because we live in a homophobic society that tells men that loving friends and being victims of sexual assault are only things that happen to the feminine- women and gay men, and that feminine is bad.
Um, so yeah,anyway, I have a lot of thoughts and this book left me with even more, and as I am the person who asked the question, I appreciate you responding and it has definitely made me think even more. Can't wait to read the sequel! :)
Homophobic. Jesus F. Christ.
Okay. I'm just getting to this now and read through everyone's comments. I have to go back to what you wrote in the post about Ghost Medicine. That's just crazy. Boys are not introspective? How can people
make such sweeping generalizations? No boy is introspective? Ghost Medicine's beauty (and this is only one aspect of its beauty) is its innocence and it's pure insight into its main character - his raw insight into himself and the world around him.
As for Marbury Jack and Connor, our world is far far from a non-heterosexist, non-homophobic place. Characters in books will reflect this uncomfortable fact of life. Jack gives voice to his reality. Now here's my sweeping generalization. All boys are influenced by the homophobia and heterosexism of our society - some more than others, not everyone acts on it - but it impacts on us all. What happens to Jack as seen through his eyes is a real glimpse into the struggle of a young man to understand his sexuality in the face of social constraints and trauma. Reader discomfort can be a good thing...
Can I be the sole gay male sounding board here?
Good. Let's get started, shall we?
Personally, the thing that forced me through Marbury Lens so quickly (and the reason it is my favorite read of this year, BY FAR; and I've read some great books this year) was Connor Kirk. First of all, I developed the biggest literary crush I think since--dare I say it--Edward Cullen. However, Connor's attraction had nothing to do with exterior. Connor Kirk reminded me of my best friend from high school--yes, when we were both teen boys. Putting myself in Jack's position, as only the best first-person narratives will us to do, I felt this natural if frightening pull toward Connor. It should be noted that, as a reader, I found Connor someone decidedly confident in his sexuality. How truly comfortable he was is up for debate, but the bulk of my crush for him extended from that sexual confidence he portrayed.
To give an example: the part where Jack walks in on Connor and the girl he's fucking at the party. Poignant moment for me, because of the question Connor asks Jack. My jaw dropped, because this was not only shocking but engagingly honest. In a single scene, Drew yanked the reader into a vast, socially unacceptable, awkward but vital conversation about male sexuality on voluminous levels.
When I read, I'm looking for two things: male protagonists and gender/sexual discussion. Both are rare, as you know, in the dominating YA culture. (Side note: each of you should read John Corey Whaley's WHERE THINGS COME BACK. Talk about a powerful teen male voice. READ IT!) When I came across Marbury Lens this summer, I smiled, wept, and sighed in relief. "Finally," I said to myself, "someone's done it."
Drew, you covered all your bases with this one. And I'm so glad there's more to come in PASSENGER. Thank God, I found an author like you at such a time in my writing career. Every aspiring author should be so lucky.
Post a Comment