Thursday, March 31, 2011
in which the unemployment rate increases
I did not sleep at all last night.
Okay.
Where to begin?
So, I've mentioned a few times now about this short story I contracted to write for a forthcoming YA anthology -- you know, how I wrote the thing at the extreme upper-end of the word count range and I finished it one month short of my deadline.
The story is actually a sub-plot to the novel I am just finishing up, and, well... naturally, I suppose, I like it a lot.
[And, no, that isn't a dumb thing to say... I think at least -- maybe more than -- half the stuff I read these days seems to be written by going-through-the-motions writers who honestly don't give a shit about what they write...]
The background to the anthology was this: The unifying thread stitching the stories together is that they are all YA, Dystopian (yuck! talk about played-out expectations... but -- and you'll agree with me if you've read The Marbury Lens -- my "Dystopian" ain't your Daddy's Dystopia), PLUS the stories all have a love story undercurrent.
So... yeah... this actually fits my arguably-not-typical-Dystopian-YA current project.
Because, after all, all my worlds are Dystopian, anyway. They just happen to be real. And here. And now. Which is why I hate that term, Dystopian. In the same way that to so many people YA equals vampires, or whatever the monster/magical being of the day is, Dystopian now equals the exact same, predictable set of expectations, too.
Which isn't really what the word means.
Sorry for the wide and scenic route.
Anyway, there are lots of "stars" of writing who are anchoring this project. I am no longer going to name their names. Well, except one of them: bestselling author Ann Aguirre.
Ann withdrew from the project a few days ago, and I wanted to know why.
So I looked it up, and found out.
Apparently, "love story" plus "YA," in the minds of many people, excludes love between two males or between two females. "YA" also, to a lot of people, means kids don't swear.
I don't know any "Young Adults" who adhere to those universal boundaries. In fact, I now have a personal policy that if I ever involve myself with a love story anthology and there is NOT at least one story included about a same-sex couple, then I can't be in it.
So, I am now unemployed.
Again.
I can't be involved in this project given the editorial stance that was expressed to another author, against same-sex love relationships. The author is someone I won't name, and have never met. But if you're really curious, the story is definitely discoverable.
As far as the swearing is concerned, I will also not be in a YA anthology if there is not at least ONE contextual selection from the following word menu:
1. shit
2. goddamn (or godamnit)
3. sonofabitch
[By the way, the story I wrote... and I worked goddamn hard on that sonofabitch, too... included all three of the above. Shit!]
and, of course,
4. fuck
That's it. They just have to have ONE of those words.
And, yes it's true, I did not use "fuck" one time in my story.
But there were -- ahem -- a couple really crafty references to masturbation -- which I'm sure would have been red-flagged as something that normal "Young Adults" never deal with.
That's it: My policy = one of those words, plus one same-sex relationship.
Is that too much to ask?
One of the explanations I read about this earlier editorial decision against having a story in which two boys fall in love was a reluctance to portray alternative relationships.
There's nothing alternative about it.
It's not a goddamned choice.
It's normal and GOOD for young, as well as old, adults. It's just how human beings are. They fall in love.
And we have a responsibility to let kids know that they're okay, and good, and not abnormal.
Don't we?
So, I hope you don't find it offensive that I have now embraced a will-not-participate-in-YA-anthologies-about-love-unless-there-is-at-least-one-same-sex-LOVE-story-and-the-use-of-one-swear-word-from-the-above-menu policy, but that's just how I roll.
Oh yeah... the Dystopian Love Doctor has eighty-sixed himself.
By the way... as unemployed as I currently am, I have this novel called Stick coming out in October.
I really LOVE that story.
In fact, there are some really touching and intense love stories that weave their way through the plot of that book. Because Stick is really all about how love doesn't weaken in the face of cruelty and ugliness -- it flourishes, no matter what.
And -- guess what? One of the love relationships in Stick is between two boys, who really, truly love each other.
And the characters in the book also use every word on my dessert menu, too.
And, guess what else?
THAT'S the real world.
Where love exists, despite all the ugliness, and there are no "alternative" versions of love, because love comes in only one form -- pure -- unrestrained by the gender of the human beings it connects and makes whole.
It's not a Dystopia.
Anyone want to buy a story about a seventeen-year-old boxer who falls in love with the daughter of a man who works on a ferry?
Never mind.
(Sound of crumpled papers hitting the bottom of the wastebasket)
You may be interested in reading Ann Aguirre's blog post here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

20 comments:
I've been watching this anthology fall apart for the last week and a half--but I had no idea THIS was the anthology you were writing for. Wow. I'm not surprised at all you're pulling out of it, but I'm really glad. It's been awesome to see all these writers standing up and saying this kind of bizarre censorship is NOT ok.
I know I do not pay attention at all to the business part of this. But -- holy crap -- I had no idea this was going on. I'm at least relieved that not even one word of my work has been seen at all by this project.
This whole situation bizarre and fascinating, but not the least bit surprising.
I appreciate your course of action, Andrew. It makes me feel a bit more comfortable to be me.
I visited the "It's Okay to be Gay" post of Jessica Verday. She does a respectable job of explaining the situation.
At the end of the post, I was surprised to see a comment from said editor. I don't really understand the comment. And why is gay an "alternative sexuality"? <---that one made me laugh out loud.
Wow. I had no idea. Way to make a stand.
Every time I see the term, "alrternative lifestyle" I cringe. I read through the links to Ann's blog and Jessica's and I can see why you withdrew. It takes courage to do so. Things have changed about the way the public views LGBTs but in many ways ... they still remain the same. What I find in workshops I do with public health workers is that people hide their thoughts better - not a bad thing when a counselor needs to think before he or she spekas to a youth - so they don't get criticized for discriminating against folks. The posts on the other author's blogs that show the editor's comments are disturbing. Her values leak out in what she says - the words she uses. This is such a good example of how people in positions of power can shape what young people see as acceptable love both from the harmful side and from the helpful side. It's great that you're taking a stand on the issue.
I've always thought of Marbury as sycktopian, for what it's worth.
And I applaud your stance. Let's write stories about young people, that actually fucking reflect what their lives are like. I mean come on, sex, gay and straight, exists. So does love, gay and straight. Why the hell can't we write about it?
I'm assuming this editor does not have teenagers or has never been around teenagers or did we just jump back in time to the 1950's?
Please don't throw your story away.You might publish it in another anthology.
You are just trouble, wherever you go, aren't you? You can't help yourself.
YAY!
Bravo on this post!
The Marbury Lens inspired me to right what I know is true and what I believe ahead of what I thought I should write. It's been the best step in the world for me, and I thank you for that.
Thank you, also, for this post.
That's what I get for commenting at 3am. "Inspired me to WRITE" not right. Sheesh. Get some sleep woman.
Wen... I can't tell you how many times per week I do the same thing. My writing day always begins at 3:00 a.m. It's kind of weird how creative my brain can be at that hour, while simultaneously frequently incapable of perceiving how it actually spells things out.
And thank you for the nice comment.
I've been sitting away from the web for a while now because this whole thing really got me depressed. But I would like to say thank you for all the nice comments people have sent me here, by email, facebook, and twitter.
Ah, thank you.
I'm always my most creative in the middle of the night, if not the most accurate. I tell my kids it's night shift, even if it looks a lot like staying up talking to my imaginary friends :)
As depressing as the net can be, it's also brilliant to see how many truly good, intelligent people there are still out there in the world. Thank you for proving to be one of them!
Rock on Andrew. This post is awesome, you are awesome and thank you for writing it, Goddammit. :)
Um... can I just say that I got a little choked up and starstruck by having A.S. King comment on my blog?
Wow. Thank you.
I LOVE your post and want a copy of your new book that I will PAY for rather than bum off somebody else to give you the $.10 or whatever is your cut. I have a wonderful daughter. She is a lesbian. She cusses. She had a hard time in high school. I have learned so much from her, dammit. I am so proud of her and give hate stares to any sonofabitch that looks at her and her fiance funny. Keep it up!
Mary Ann,
That's about the nicest comment I've ever received. Love to you and your daughter.
Andrew
I'm sparing with my swears (I grew up with people for whom 'damn' and 'hell' were reserved for emergencies), but it's ludicrous to leave swear words out of all YA.
Until I read your post, I'd never thought about how 'alternative' could be seen as obnoxious, but you're right, it is. I tell my kids I don't care whether they're gay or straight, whatever they are is okay with me. But what you ARE can't be an alternative unless you choose it.
Thank you for making that point. I'd probably have seen it somewhere else eventually, but I'm glad I found out sooner than later.
Good for you! As the parent of a lesbian teen, and as a teacher-librarian, I am really saddened by the adults who think that they know what is best for queer youth. My daughter has been "out" since she was in grade 7 and was harassed all through middle school. She was told by both the school counsellor and the vice principal that it was her own fault for being out. When I brought this up with the principal he told me that middle school students weren't old enough to know if they were gay or not. He didn't answer when I asked him if they were old enough to know if they were straight. Congratulations for standing up for your convictions. The queer youth need more people like you out there. Oh, and I completely agree with you on the swearing thing. Anyone who thinks swearing is inappropriate for a YA book obviously has not been in a high school in the past 50 years.
Nuh-uh! I'm an Andrew Smith fan, so I'm all honored to be commenting on your blog. See? And this blog brought my attention to this editor and the situation (which I'd missed due to being locked in my office all week) so I thank you for it.
And diachan: YES. What a perfect question. Is middle school too early to identify as straight? Hmmm.
I've said it before and I'll say it until the end of time: the bullies in school are hard enough, but the adults who join in by default are disgraceful.
Post a Comment